Reinventing the Wheel

I am a great believer or reuse things, especially if I know something has already proven itself to be a viable solution. As pathetic example, I hold the opinion of a library of models for things like word processing and desktop publishing documents, Web pages and databases simple drawings. I select a model, and then fine-tune until I get what I want. I find that saves me a lot of time as opposed to the development of the case from scratch. If I find something else beneficial along the way, I add it to my library. In the world system, I have always advocated the sharing and reuse of information resources, such as data processing and components, which I often alluded to the "building blocks" for the development of systems . It's just a smarter way of operating and, frankly, I do not reinvent the wheel for each project, I work. Instead, I want to do the job. If it means something reuse, so whatever, senseless of his age, if it works, it works. I am not an advocate of "throw out! the baby with the bath moisten", but I know many people who are just the opposite of that and are constantly reinventing the wheel. I do not know why it is so, but I think it probably has something to do with the human ego. It is in this way that someone expression, "Well, if I did not think of it, it can not be any good and I will go and invent myself. & # 8221; We have seen over the years when we sold our "PRIDE" methodologies for the design of systems. We met several people who thought that our methods was nice, but think they could do better themselves and invested thousands of dollars trying to reinvent the wheel. Inevitably, these companies eventually disasters, and we express our product sold at the end. I am always amazed by the amount of time and money these companies wasted in the process, even if, because of all ego. A few years ago, General Motors took heat for a Pontiac drag the machine in an Oldsmobile chassis. People design they were getting gypped by obtain! ing a "cheap" engine. For me, I thought that GM was bright. He! re we ha ve a company that has developed products with interchangeable parts in mind. This has enabled them to change the inventory overhead, the integration of their product lines, and continue to produce at a lower cost upright. And I can tell you, there's nothing "cheap" about a Pontiac engine. Nevertheless, the public does not see it that way. In the world of systems, I think you would be surprised to see how software is thrown away each output of a product. Instead of code reuse program, many companies sincerely reinventing the wheel with each release. I find this a little strange and an enormous waste of through traffic. Perhaps it is because people do not know how to share and reuse of parts, either that or they do not want. Anyway, the man tends to avoid sharing and reusing anything, and reinvent the wheel each overshoot, which leads to increased development costs, which, of course, is inflationary. Another reason not to share my view is that to be true that we no longer have! a sense of history. We do not study what has worked and what has not years ago, we are interested only in the present. Consequently, this leads to the multitude of reinvent a wheel that was invented some time ago. There has been a lot of tools developed over the years to standardize and share components; any nomenclature Processors (BOMP) in the manufacturing sector, with deposits in the area. You can find these tools in almost all sectors of activity. The technology is available to share and reuse components, but the desire of culture and the elements to do so is not. I tell you, sharing and reusing things is not easy. It requires a concerted management effort to make it happen. But if management is unaware of the problem and does not care about the amount of money they spend in vain, year after year, then I think we will be "reinventing the wheel" for a long time to come. My gift card
home equity loan!